Introduction
Ocular allergy (OA) is a common eye
condition encountered in clinical practice (Kari & Saari 2012). OA
represents a collection of ocular hypersensitivity disorders affecting the
eyelid, conjunctiva, and cornea. OA includes seasonal and perennial allergic
conjunctivitis (SAC and PAC), vernal and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (VKC and
AKC), and contact blepharoconjunctivitis (CBC). These clinical subtypes
may be diagnosed and managed by considering clinical history and signs and symptoms,
aided by in vivo and in vitro tests (Leonardi et al., 2019).
Risk
factors
Ocular allergic inflammation is a
very common event due to frequent contact of the eye with environmental
allergens (Doğan & Ağca 2018). Doğan & Ağca 2018 found that prenatal
maternal paracetamol exposure and shorter duration of vitamin D supplementation
in the postnatal period may play a role in development of SAC, and that
patients with SAC were more likely to have asthma, allergic rhinitis and oral
allergy syndrome while, their relatives also may demonstrate higher rates of
allergic diseases. Allergic conjunctivitis is triggered by allergens such as
pollen, dust mites, mold, and pet dander (Ismail & Yuanita 2024).
Symptoms
OA is a public health concern significantly
affecting the quality of life of a large proportion of the population
worldwide. The prevalence of this condition has been steadily increasing in
both developed and developing countries with children being more frequently
affected (Ismail & Yuanita 2024). Accurate diagnosis of allergic
conjunctivitis can be challenging, as its symptoms often overlap with other
ocular conditions, such as viral or bacterial conjunctivitis. Typical symptoms
include itching, redness, watery discharge, and swelling of the conjunctiva,
which can significantly impair daily functioning. While a thorough patient
history and clinical examination are essential, diagnostic tests such as
conjunctival provocation tests and skin prick tests can provide additional
support in confirming the allergic etiology of the condition (Ismail &
Yuanita 2024).
In terms of diagnosis, allergic
conjunctivitis is often underdiagnosed or mismanaged, particularly by general
practitioners, who rely heavily on symptomatology and may not conduct
comprehensive allergy testing (Ismail & Yuanita 2024). Patients with
multiple allergic conditions may require a more integrated, multidisciplinary
approach to care. The interplay between allergic conjunctivitis and other
allergic conditions reinforces the need for comprehensive allergy testing and
the use of treatments that address multiple allergic pathways simultaneously. This
comorbidity association further complicates diagnosis and treatment (Ismail
& Yuanita 2024).
Management
The incorrect management of OA may
increase the risk of local and systemic treatment-related side effects (Leonardi
et al., 2019). The management of OA involves a combination of pharmacologic and
non-pharmacologic treatments.
Pharmacological treatment
Pharmacologically, dual-acting
antihistamine-mast cell stabilizers are considered first-line treatments for allergic
conjunctivitis. These agents provide rapid relief of symptoms by blocking
histamine receptors and stabilizing mast cells, thus preventing further
allergic responses. For patients with more severe or persistent symptoms,
corticosteroids and mast cell stabilizers are often used. Leonardi et al.
(2015) observed that corticosteroids were used in 41% of patients, highlighting
their role in managing chronic or more severe cases of AC. However, these
treatments are typically reserved for short-term use due to potential side
effects such as increased intraocular pressure and cataract formation with
prolonged use. In addition to pharmacologic treatments, allergen immunotherapy
(AIT) remains a key strategy for longterm management. This approach aims to
desensitize patients to the allergens responsible for triggering OA. AIT is
particularly beneficial for patients with persistent symptoms who do not
respond adequately to other treatments. Immunomodulatory treatments for OA
include allergen-specific immunotherapy and biologicals (Ismail & Yuanita
2024).
There is a wide range of treatment
options for OA. Topical drugs for OA can be classified into different
pharmacological classes based on their mechanism of action:
|
Class |
Example |
|
Antihistamines |
Levocabastine, Emedastine |
|
Mast cell stabilizers |
Cromolyn, Nedocromil,
Lodoxamide, NAAGA |
|
Dual-acting agents -topical
mast cell stabilizers and antihistamines |
Alcaftadine, Azelastine,
Bepotastine, Epinastine, Ketotifen, Olopatadine |
|
Alpha-adrenergic
agonists – vasoconstrictors |
Naphazoline/Pheniramine |
|
Corticosteroids |
Hydrocortisone, Loteprednol,
Fluorometholone, Desonide, Rimexolone, Prednisolone, Dexamethasone, Betamethasone |
|
Calcineurin
inhibitors |
Cyclosporine A, Tacrolimus |
|
Non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (prostaglandin inhibitors) |
Ketorolac
Tromethamine |
Overall,
-
Topical
antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers appear to be safe and well tolerated.
-
Topical
antihistamines and dual-acting drugs may lead to a quicker onset symptom relief
when compared to mast cell stabilizers. Dual-acting agents with combined mast
cell stabilizer and antihistaminic function provide better symptom control. The
most frequently reported side effects from the use of these agents are burning
and stinging sensation, blurred vision and unacceptable aftertaste. To minimize
possible toxic effects of preservative compounds on the ocular surface,
single-dose preservative-free eye drops should be used whenever possible.
(Leonardi et al., 2019).
-
Topical
decongestants are frequently used as first-line treatment due to their
availability over the counter. They merely alleviate hyperemia, having
little to no relief from itching and a short duration of action. They may cause
side effects such as rebound redness, chronic follicular conjunctivitis, and
tachyphylaxis. Vasoconstrictors alleviate only hyperemia. They should be used
with caution and for a short period of 5-7 days because of side effects
(Leonardi et al., 2019).
-
Topical
NSAIDS are more effective than placebo in reducing ocular itching and redness.
NSAIDs are rarely used due to their local side effects, such as
burning/stinging after application. NSAIDs are effective for their short-term
use but do not target specific inflammatory mechanisms (Leonardi et al., 2019).
-
Topical
corticosteroids should not be the first choice of therapy for OA. In clinical
practice, they are the most effective anti-inflammatory agents in active OA.
Because of potential adverse effects (increased intraocular pressure, with a
potential evolution toward glaucoma, cataract formation, bacterial, viral and
fungal superinfections), their use must be monitored especially in prolonged
treatments. The potency and treatment duration of the topical corticosteroid
should be chosen clinically based on the severity of ocular inflammation and
corneal involvement. Topical corticosteroids eye drops should be used with
caution under ophthalmologist's monitoring and preferably for shorter duration
due to the high risk of local and potential blinding side effects (Leonardi et
al., 2019).
-
Topical
calcineurin inhibitors are the most frequently used treatments as
steroid-sparing agents in steroid-dependent cases of VKC and AKC (Leonardi et
al., 2019).
Nonpharmacological management
Patients and caregivers should
receive educative support regarding the anticipated duration and prognosis of
the OA, and possible complications from suboptimal control. The first line
of management is the identification of offending allergens and avoidance
measures. Particularly during exacerbations in VKC, to minimize the exposure to
nonspecific triggering factors, such as sun, wind, and salty water, patients
should use measures such as glasses, hats with visors, and swimming goggles (Leonardi
et al., 2019). Comert, Karakaya & Kalyoncu (2016) demonstrated that standard
wraparound eyeglasses can provide a safe, convenient, and effective measure for
protection from pollens in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.
Non-pharmacologic approaches, such
as the use of cold compresses (CC) and artificial tears (ATs), have been shown
to provide significant relief. CC may
provide decongestant effect. Tear substitutes aid in stabilization of the tear
film providing a better mucosal barrier against allergens, acting as an eyewash
and diluting the concentration of mediators in the tear film in contact with
the ocular surface (Leonardi et al., 2019). Bilkhu et al. (2014) demonstrated
that CC combined with ATs effectively reduced bulbar conjunctival hyperemia and
ocular symptoms, returning temperature to baseline faster than no treatment.
Additionally, CC were found to enhance the effect of antihistamine eye drops,
indicating that these simple interventions can offer quick symptomatic relief (Ismail
& Yuanita 2024). ATs and CC, either
alone or combined, may be considered as front line agents for acute SAC by
staff to whom pharmacological treatment options are limited (Kari & Saari
2012).
Products with herbal extracts such
as chamomile-containing eye drops should be avoided as they may cross-react
with allergens (for example, Artemisia vulgaris) (Leonardi et al., 2019).
Frequent hand, face, lid hygiene, and eye washing should also be suggested.
Overall, avoidance of specific and
nonspecific triggers is the first step in the prevention of ocular allergy
symptoms. Use cold compresses, good eyelid hygiene, and lubricants. Topical
antihistamines, mast cell stabilizers, or double-action drugs are the first
treatment choice and may be used in combination. They should be used frequently
during the day and during the whole season. Systemic anti-allergic drugs should
be used when ocular symptoms are associated with other allergic comorbidities. Topical
corticosteroids should be used as short, pulsed therapy, in acute exacerbations
or when the cornea is involved, under ophthalmologist's monitoring. Topical
calcineurin inhibitors, preferentially cyclosporine A (0.1% on-label treatment
in the EU), may be used as a steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent
patients followed in specialized centers; tacrolimus 0.1% eye drops should be
reserved for severe VKC and AKC cases refractory to CsA (off-label treatment in
the EU). A systemic immunosuppressive treatment should be prescribed in most
refractory cases of AKC with visual threat. Cyclosporine is the most frequently
used drug. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are alternative options (Leonardi
et al., 2019).
Treatments of ocular comorbidities
and complications
Corneal epithelial erosions, shield ulcers,
and plaques, frequently observed in AKC and VKC, occur as a result
of mediators released from inflammatory cells and partially by the mechanical
trauma from upper tarsal conjunctival giant papillae (GP). Delayed epithelial
healing may lead to secondary infections, corneal opacities, and amblyopia (Leonardi
et al 2019).
Allergic patients in childhood may
develop keratoconus, a progressive, noninflammatory disorder of the
cornea characterized by thinning and steepening in the central or paracentral
cornea causing irregular astigmatism and subsequent decrease in visual acuity.
Corneal cross-linking, consisting in the topical application of a 0.1%
riboflavin 5-phosphate solution to the de-epithelized corneal surface followed
by exposure to UVA radiation, seems to be a safe and effective surgical option
to arrest disease progression, which may be very aggressive in children. Visual
rehabilitation in early and moderate stages consists of spectacles, contact
lenses, and intracorneal ring implantation. Although the clinical outcome of
corneal transplantation in keratoconus with and without VKC is comparable,
postoperative complications are more common in VKC. Atopy is a risk factor for
complications after corneal grafting (Leonardi et al 2019).
Prolonged treatment with topical
steroids should be avoided since glaucoma can occur in all
age-groups. Withdrawal of steroids and addition of antiglaucoma medications is
effective in controlling IOP in the majority of patients. Glaucoma surgery
is rarely necessary (Leonardi et al 2019).
Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) is a rare complication
of longstanding VKC and AKC, contributing to severe visual impairment. It
is characterized by conjunctival epithelial ingrowth on the cornea,
neovascularization, ocular surface inflammation, and/or recurrent corneal
epithelial defects. Fibrovascular pannus resection with amniotic membrane
transplantation or allolimbal transplantation with systemic
immunosuppression has been reported in severe patients (Leonardi et al 2019).
Conclusion
A multifaceted treatment regimen
comprising patient education, lifestyle modification, and topical medications
may be required in order to manage ocular allergies effectively. The
appropriate treatment paradigm is based on the severity of the patients’ signs
and symptoms. For moderate-to-severe cases, especially chronic vernal
keratoconjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, and giant papillary
conjunctivitis, co-management with an ophthalmologist is recommended (O’Brien 2013).
Many patients remain undiagnosed or inadequately treated, highlighting the
need for improved awareness, diagnostics, and future research (Ismail &
Yuanita 2024).
REFERENCES
1. Kari, O., & Saari, K. M.
(2012). Diagnostics and new developments in the treatment of ocular
allergies. Current allergy and asthma reports, 12(3),
232-239.
2. Leonardi, A., Silva, D., Perez
Formigo, D., Bozkurt, B., Sharma, V., Allegri, P., ... & Fauquert, J. L.
(2019). Management of ocular allergy. Allergy, 74(9),
1611-1630.
3. Doğan, Ü., & Ağca, S. (2018).
Investigation of possible risk factors in the development of seasonal allergic
conjunctivitis. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 11(9),
1508.
4. Ismail, I. S., & Yuanita, Y.
(2024). The Analysis Study of Prevalence, Diagnosis and Management of Allergic
Conjunctivitis: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. The International
Journal of Medical Science and Health Research, 6(2), 1-20.
5.
Leonardi,
A., Piliego, F., Castegnaro, A., Lazzarini, D., La Gloria Valerio, A., Mattana,
P., & Fregona, I. (2015). Allergic conjunctivitis: a cross‐sectional study. Clinical
& Experimental Allergy, 45(6), 1118-1125.
6.
Comert,
S., Karakaya, G., & Kalyoncu, A. F. (2016, July). Wraparound eyeglasses
improve symptoms and quality of life in patients with seasonal allergic
rhinoconjunctivitis. In International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (Vol.
6, No. 7, pp. 722-730).
7. Bilkhu,
P. S., Wolffsohn, J. S., Naroo, S. A., Robertson, L., & Kennedy, R. (2014).
Effectiveness of nonpharmacologic treatments for acute seasonal allergic
conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology, 121(1), 72-78.
8. O’Brien,
T. P. (2013). Allergic conjunctivitis: an update on diagnosis and
management. Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 13(5),
543-549.
9. Fauquert,
J. L. (2019). Diagnosing and managing allergic conjunctivitis in childhood: the
allergist’s perspective. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 30(4),
405-414.